User Tools

Site Tools


gaussian

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
gaussian [2025/12/02 14:41] spencergaussian [2025/12/02 15:04] (current) – [The Wick formula] spencer
Line 40: Line 40:
     \langle x \rangle = 0     \langle x \rangle = 0
 \] \]
-since $x e^{-\frac{x^2}{2}} = \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}x} e^{-\frac{x^2}{2}}$ is a total derivative.+since $x e^{-\frac{x^2}{2}} = -\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}x} e^{-\frac{x^2}{2}}$ is a total derivative.
 We likewise compute We likewise compute
 \begin{align*} \begin{align*}
Line 53: Line 53:
  
 The goal is to extend this formula into the multivariate setting, and therefore find a rule to evaluate for any monomial the quantity $\langle x_{i_1} \cdots x_{i_k}\rangle$. The goal is to extend this formula into the multivariate setting, and therefore find a rule to evaluate for any monomial the quantity $\langle x_{i_1} \cdots x_{i_k}\rangle$.
 +Certainly if the degree of the monomial is odd, its Gaussian integral is zero; some variable must occur in odd degree, and then the single variable proof suffices.
 +Moreover, integrating by parts gives $\langle x_i x_j \rangle_A = (A^{-1})_{ij}$.
 +
 +**Theorem ** (Wick). Let $f_1, \ldots, f_{2n}$ be linear polynomials. Then
 +\[
 +  \langle f_1 \cdots f_{2n} \rangle_A = \frac{1}{2^n n!} \sum \langle f_{p_1} f_{q_1} \rangle_A \cdots \langle f_{p_n} f_{q_n} \rangle_A,
 +\]
 +where the sum runs over permutations of $(1, \ldots, 2n)$.
 +
 +Note that $\frac{(2n)!}{2^n n!} = (2n-1)!!$, as we would expect.
 +The formula can be made more computationally efficient by summing just over those permutations for which the $p_i$ are increasing and $p_j < q_j$ for each $j$; there are $(2n-1)!!$ of these, so no normalization is needed.
 +This is probably only really useful when $n = 4$ or $6$, after which there is already an explosion in the number of terms needed.
 +
 +A consequence of Wick's formula is that the Gaussian integral of a monomial is a sum of products of matrix coefficients, and thus Gaussian integration against a monomial is a kind of a permanent-type operation applied to $A^{-1}$; thus Cramer's rule implies that Gaussian integrals of polynomials are always rational functions in the entries of $A$.
 +
 +The proof of the Wick formula is simple; assume that the input polynomials are all monomial, and after an orthogonal change of coordinates assume that $A$ is diagonal. Then integrate by parts until you're done.
gaussian.1764704517.txt.gz · Last modified: by spencer