gaussian
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| gaussian [2025/12/02 14:41] – spencer | gaussian [2025/12/02 15:04] (current) – [The Wick formula] spencer | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| \langle x \rangle = 0 | \langle x \rangle = 0 | ||
| \] | \] | ||
| - | since $x e^{-\frac{x^2}{2}} = \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}x} e^{-\frac{x^2}{2}}$ is a total derivative. | + | since $x e^{-\frac{x^2}{2}} = -\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}x} e^{-\frac{x^2}{2}}$ is a total derivative. |
| We likewise compute | We likewise compute | ||
| \begin{align*} | \begin{align*} | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
| The goal is to extend this formula into the multivariate setting, and therefore find a rule to evaluate for any monomial the quantity $\langle x_{i_1} \cdots x_{i_k}\rangle$. | The goal is to extend this formula into the multivariate setting, and therefore find a rule to evaluate for any monomial the quantity $\langle x_{i_1} \cdots x_{i_k}\rangle$. | ||
| + | Certainly if the degree of the monomial is odd, its Gaussian integral is zero; some variable must occur in odd degree, and then the single variable proof suffices. | ||
| + | Moreover, integrating by parts gives $\langle x_i x_j \rangle_A = (A^{-1})_{ij}$. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Theorem ** (Wick). Let $f_1, \ldots, f_{2n}$ be linear polynomials. Then | ||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \langle f_1 \cdots f_{2n} \rangle_A = \frac{1}{2^n n!} \sum \langle f_{p_1} f_{q_1} \rangle_A \cdots \langle f_{p_n} f_{q_n} \rangle_A, | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | where the sum runs over permutations of $(1, \ldots, 2n)$. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Note that $\frac{(2n)!}{2^n n!} = (2n-1)!!$, as we would expect. | ||
| + | The formula can be made more computationally efficient by summing just over those permutations for which the $p_i$ are increasing and $p_j < q_j$ for each $j$; there are $(2n-1)!!$ of these, so no normalization is needed. | ||
| + | This is probably only really useful when $n = 4$ or $6$, after which there is already an explosion in the number of terms needed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A consequence of Wick's formula is that the Gaussian integral of a monomial is a sum of products of matrix coefficients, | ||
| + | |||
| + | The proof of the Wick formula is simple; assume that the input polynomials are all monomial, and after an orthogonal change of coordinates assume that $A$ is diagonal. Then integrate by parts until you're done. | ||
gaussian.1764704517.txt.gz · Last modified: by spencer
